A Review of Research on University Presidents Selection System in Recent Ten Years

Fan Yanhua; Yu Qing

doi:doi:10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11

| Peer-Reviewed

A Review of Research on University Presidents Selection System in Recent Ten Years

Fan Yanhua, Yu Qing

Published in Science Journal of Education (Volume 7, Issue 3)

Received: 26 May 2019 Accepted: 10 July 2019 Published: 30 July 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

"Double First-Class" construction needs first-class university presidents. The standardized system of selecting and appointing university presidents can promote excellent university presidents and promote their professional development. This paper is to review the selection system of university presidents in recent ten years from 2007 through analyzing comprehensively the research of selecting standards, selecting methods and the program and tenure by literature analyzation. The research of selecting standards includes studying their personal characteristics, educational background, working experience and decision-managing abilities. The research of selecting methods is mainly from the perspective of country reference, which can be summarized in the following three: the selection system represented by the USA and Britain, the two-stage system represented by Japan and European countries and the central appointment system represented by our country. The research of the tenure of university presidents mainly focuses on the employment period and relative factors which influence the tenure. It turns out that the selecting standards of the university presidents in our country are to be improved; the selecting methods and program lack flexibility; the tenure is comparatively short; and the degree of specialization is to beehanced compared with other countries.

Published in	Science Journal of Education (Volume 7, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11
Page(s)	65-72
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

University President, Selection System, Specialization, "Double First-Class" Construction, Review

References

[1]	Zhu Hongqi. Towards the specialization of principals [J]. Educational Research.
[2]	Guo Jun, Ma Wanhua. An empirical study on the group characteristics of American University presidents--a perspective based on the background of history [J]. Comparative education Research, 2013 (01): 17-21.
[3]	Zhang Yingqiang, Suo Kaifeng,. Who's doing the research on the president of China's undergraduate university--a survey of college presidents' employment [J]. Higher education Research, 2016 (06): 12-25.
[4]	Li Qiaozhen. Analysis of the characteristics of current principals in key universities in China--a case study of "211 Project" hundred Universities [J]. Higher education exploration, 2016 (03): 34-40.
[5]	Xieqing. Three key issues in the selection of first-class university presidents [J]. China University Science and Technology, 2014 (03): 26-28.
[6]	Li Zhongwei Study on the personal characteristics of the current school principals in 985 Project [J]. University education Management, 2016 (04): 32-43.
[7]	Wu Jian, The influence of educational background on the selection of university presidents from the quality of the presidents of foreign famous universities [J]. Higher education Research, 2010 (07): 105-109.
[8]	Li Ping. The difference analysis of the principal selection system of American and Japanese public research universities [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2011: 10-20.
[9]	Guo Jun, Sun Yu, Huangxin. The academic background of university presidents ' Education in China--a case study of 115 "211 Project" university Presidents [J]. Chinese higher Education Research, 2012 (08): 24-29.
[10]	Zhu Jian. Study on the qualifications of university presidents in England--an interpretation based on five university presidents ' job postings [J]. Fudan Education Forum, 2014 (03): 18-23.
[11]	Wang Jianjun, Weng Wanpingt. Study on the qualifications of university presidents in the United States--an interpretation of the six University Presidents ' selection announcement [J]. Chongqing Higher Education Research, 2015 (1): 94-111.
[12]	Ren Zhen. Study on the selection criteria and procedures of the top 70 university presidents in the world [D]. Jinan: Shandong University of Finance and Economics, 2013: 47-57.
[13]	Wang Min. The academic background of the incumbent principal of Taiwan Public University [J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (social Science Edition), 2012 (5): 159-163.
[14]	Shang Guanjun, Guo Jun, Li Kai, Study on the professional background of Chinese university presidents--taking the 115 "211 Project" university presidents as an example [J]. Monthly Education, 2011 (11): 6-9.
[15]	Zhong Binglin, Zhou Haitao. The principal selection mechanism of world-class universities and its revelation--a comparative study of Presidents ' Management in world-class universities [J]. Journal of the National Institute of Educational Administration, 2011 (08): 6-14.
[16]	Liu Weina. A comparative study on the selection mechanism of the presidents of public universities in Taiwan [D]. Xi ' an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2011: 25.
[17]	Qian Peizhong, Li Yingying. Historical changes of the standard and social image of university presidents in China [J]. Jiangsu Higher Education, 2013 (4): 25-28.
[18]	Ji Chengjun. A comparative analysis of the university presidents selection in China and abroad [J]. Chinese Science and Technology Awards, 2013 (08): 24-27.
[19]	Tangjian, Chen Yan. The selection of university presidents: Practice and thinking--based on the comparative study between America and China [J]. Higher education development and Assessment, 2012 (2): 26-31.
[20]	Xiong Wanxi. University President Selection: The experience of top American universities--an interview with Derek bOK, former president of Harvard University [J]. Modern university education, 2013 (5): 18-22.
[21]	Xiong Wanxi. Study on the selection process of world-class university presidents--a case of 2004 years of MIT President Selection [J]. Modern university education, 2014 (1): 63-67.
[22]	Qi Pinwei, Sun Hongzhi. The selection of British university presidents and the role of principals [J]. World Education information, 2008: 52-54.
[23]	Ming Xin. A comparative study on the selection system of university presidents in the United States and Britain [J]. Coal higher Education, 2007 (1): 68-71.
[24]	Chen Wei. The function and selection of university presidents in Britain [J]. Chinese higher Education, 2014 (5): 61-63.
[25]	Fu Lianxing. International comparative Study on the selection and appointment of university presidents [J]. Journal of Linyi Teachers College, 2017 (2): 116-118.
[26]	Chen Yan. Research on the reform of the selection and appointment system of Chinese university presidents [D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2011: 30-35.
[27]	Zhong Binglin, Zhou Haitao, the principal selection mechanism of world-class universities--a comparative study of Presidents ' Management in world-class universities [J]. Journal of the National Institute of Educational Administration, 2011 (8): 6-14.
[28]	Sun Jin. How to elect the headmaster of German top universities--case study of Heidelberg University [J]. Comparative education Research, 2014 (3): 7-12.
[29]	Ma Huaide. Presidential selection system and governance structure of European universities [J]. Education Research, 2011 (2): 104-109.
[30]	Zhang Jinwei. The improvement of the open selection procedure of Chinese university presidents [J]. Shanghai Education Evaluation Research, 2014 (3): 32-35.
[31]	Zhang Yingqiang, suo Kaifeng, who is doing the president of Chinese undergraduate University--a survey of the current position of university presidents in China [J]. Higher education Research, 2016, 37 (06): 12-25.
[32]	Chen Yan. The role, quality and scientific selection of Chinese university presidents in the Age of globalization [J]. Jiangsu Social Sciences, 2011 (5): 243-248.
[33]	Yao Jinju. A study on the legal issues of the selection of public university principals [J]. Journal of the National Institute of Educational Administration, 2014 (5): 63-68.
[34]	Xu Guodong. Research on the selection mechanism of modern universities in China [J]. Journal of the National Institute of Educational Administration, 2010 (6): 18-22.
[35]	Yang Xinglin, how to select the university president in China--three emphasis on the angle of torture [J]. Chongqing Higher Education Research, 2016 (1): 96-114.
[36]	Fan Xiaojie. Research on the selection mechanism of university principals under the perspective of "principal-agent" relationship [J]. Exploration of higher Education, 2015 (1): 10-15.
[37]	Lin Zhaohong, Zhang Rui. The prospect of perfecting the mechanism of college President selection--a mixed view based on higher order theory and competency model [J]. UNESCO, 2013 (3): 1-14.
[38]	Zhang Xin, zhang Meng. An analysis of the presidency of American Research Universities [J]. Heilongjiang Education (research and evaluation of higher education), 2017 (6): 80-83.
[39]	Liu Xiuli, zhang Junhui. Comparative study on the tenure of Chinese and foreign university presidents [J]. Foreign education Research, 2007 (12): 72-76.
[40]	Liu Siliang, Xia Quan. A study on the group characteristics of outgoing principals of nine School Alliance [J]. Modern university education, 2016 (3): 103-111.
[41]	Chen Yinyin, Guan Hua. The status quo of university presidents ' tenure and suggestions for improvement--taking "985 universities" as an example [J]. Coal higher Education, 2016 (2): 23-122.
[42]	Yu Xinan. Reforming the transformation of "public" to "private" in colleges and universities--from the average term of office of university presidents in China only 4.1 years [J]. Journal of Huanghe University of Science and Technology, 2009 (02): 3-6.
[43]	Liu Xiuli, zhang Junhui. A comparative study of the tenure of university presidents in China and abroad [J]. Foreign education Research, 2007 (12): 72-76.
[44]	Chen Hong, yuan Benhong. On the status quo and selection of principals of private universities in China [J]. Advanced Engineering Education Research, 2016 (4): 112-116.
[45]	Yu Ying, Qin Cong. A review of the tenure system of university presidents in China [J]. Heilongjiang Education (research and evaluation of higher education), 2014 (6): 68-71.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fan Yanhua, Yu Qing. (2019). A Review of Research on University Presidents Selection System in Recent Ten Years. Science Journal of Education, 7(3), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fan Yanhua; Yu Qing. A Review of Research on University Presidents Selection System in Recent Ten Years. Sci. J. Educ. 2019, 7(3), 65-72. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fan Yanhua, Yu Qing. A Review of Research on University Presidents Selection System in Recent Ten Years. Sci J Educ. 2019;7(3):65-72. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11,
  author = {Fan Yanhua and Yu Qing},
  title = {A Review of Research on University Presidents Selection System in Recent Ten Years},
  journal = {Science Journal of Education},
  volume = {7},
  number = {3},
  pages = {65-72},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20190703.11},
  abstract = {"Double First-Class" construction needs first-class university presidents. The standardized system of selecting and appointing university presidents can promote excellent university presidents and promote their professional development. This paper is to review the selection system of university presidents in recent ten years from 2007 through analyzing comprehensively the research of selecting standards, selecting methods and the program and tenure by literature analyzation. The research of selecting standards includes studying their personal characteristics, educational background, working experience and decision-managing abilities. The research of selecting methods is mainly from the perspective of country reference, which can be summarized in the following three: the selection system represented by the USA and Britain, the two-stage system represented by Japan and European countries and the central appointment system represented by our country. The research of the tenure of university presidents mainly focuses on the employment period and relative factors which influence the tenure. It turns out that the selecting standards of the university presidents in our country are to be improved; the selecting methods and program lack flexibility; the tenure is comparatively short; and the degree of specialization is to beehanced compared with other countries.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Review of Research on University Presidents Selection System in Recent Ten Years
AU  - Fan Yanhua
AU  - Yu Qing
Y1  - 2019/07/30
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11
T2  - Science Journal of Education
JF  - Science Journal of Education
JO  - Science Journal of Education
SP  - 65
EP  - 72
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2329-0897
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11
AB  - "Double First-Class" construction needs first-class university presidents. The standardized system of selecting and appointing university presidents can promote excellent university presidents and promote their professional development. This paper is to review the selection system of university presidents in recent ten years from 2007 through analyzing comprehensively the research of selecting standards, selecting methods and the program and tenure by literature analyzation. The research of selecting standards includes studying their personal characteristics, educational background, working experience and decision-managing abilities. The research of selecting methods is mainly from the perspective of country reference, which can be summarized in the following three: the selection system represented by the USA and Britain, the two-stage system represented by Japan and European countries and the central appointment system represented by our country. The research of the tenure of university presidents mainly focuses on the employment period and relative factors which influence the tenure. It turns out that the selecting standards of the university presidents in our country are to be improved; the selecting methods and program lack flexibility; the tenure is comparatively short; and the degree of specialization is to beehanced compared with other countries.
VL  - 7
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Fan Yanhua

Department of Human Resource Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
Yu Qing

Department of Teacher Education, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Fan Yanhua, Yu Qing. (2019). A Review of Research on University Presidents Selection System in Recent Ten Years. Science Journal of Education, 7(3), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Fan Yanhua; Yu Qing. A Review of Research on University Presidents Selection System in Recent Ten Years. Sci. J. Educ. 2019, 7(3), 65-72. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Fan Yanhua, Yu Qing. A Review of Research on University Presidents Selection System in Recent Ten Years. Sci J Educ. 2019;7(3):65-72. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11,
  author = {Fan Yanhua and Yu Qing},
  title = {A Review of Research on University Presidents Selection System in Recent Ten Years},
  journal = {Science Journal of Education},
  volume = {7},
  number = {3},
  pages = {65-72},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20190703.11},
  abstract = {"Double First-Class" construction needs first-class university presidents. The standardized system of selecting and appointing university presidents can promote excellent university presidents and promote their professional development. This paper is to review the selection system of university presidents in recent ten years from 2007 through analyzing comprehensively the research of selecting standards, selecting methods and the program and tenure by literature analyzation. The research of selecting standards includes studying their personal characteristics, educational background, working experience and decision-managing abilities. The research of selecting methods is mainly from the perspective of country reference, which can be summarized in the following three: the selection system represented by the USA and Britain, the two-stage system represented by Japan and European countries and the central appointment system represented by our country. The research of the tenure of university presidents mainly focuses on the employment period and relative factors which influence the tenure. It turns out that the selecting standards of the university presidents in our country are to be improved; the selecting methods and program lack flexibility; the tenure is comparatively short; and the degree of specialization is to beehanced compared with other countries.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Review of Research on University Presidents Selection System in Recent Ten Years
AU  - Fan Yanhua
AU  - Yu Qing
Y1  - 2019/07/30
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11
T2  - Science Journal of Education
JF  - Science Journal of Education
JO  - Science Journal of Education
SP  - 65
EP  - 72
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2329-0897
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20190703.11
AB  - "Double First-Class" construction needs first-class university presidents. The standardized system of selecting and appointing university presidents can promote excellent university presidents and promote their professional development. This paper is to review the selection system of university presidents in recent ten years from 2007 through analyzing comprehensively the research of selecting standards, selecting methods and the program and tenure by literature analyzation. The research of selecting standards includes studying their personal characteristics, educational background, working experience and decision-managing abilities. The research of selecting methods is mainly from the perspective of country reference, which can be summarized in the following three: the selection system represented by the USA and Britain, the two-stage system represented by Japan and European countries and the central appointment system represented by our country. The research of the tenure of university presidents mainly focuses on the employment period and relative factors which influence the tenure. It turns out that the selecting standards of the university presidents in our country are to be improved; the selecting methods and program lack flexibility; the tenure is comparatively short; and the degree of specialization is to beehanced compared with other countries.
VL  - 7
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download