European engineering colleges and universities account for a large proportion. The characteristics of engineering education Accreditation are reflected in the combination of professional Accreditation and curriculum design. The unification of Accreditation standards and the two-wheel drive of classification evaluation, the effective connection of professional Accreditation and engineer qualifications, and the importance of practicality in curriculum design And applicability, pay attention to the important role of employers in the process of student academic Accreditation and evaluation. China’s engineering education and other applied professional Accreditation and evaluations should learn from the above-mentioned characteristics of European engineering Accreditation. In the past ten years, China’s applied professional evaluation reforms in science and engineering, have gradually been in line with developed countries. Practice base construction, Embedded joint training and other methods in cooperation with employers have made great progress in universities across the country, but in terms of professional Accreditation and engineer qualifications, engineering and technical personnel serving as frontline teachers, and emphasis on the role of employers in the process of student academic Accreditation and evaluation More needs to be done.
Published in | Science Innovation (Volume 9, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.si.20210906.11 |
Page(s) | 216-221 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Europe, Engineering Education, Accreditation
[1] | 刘晖,孟卫青,汤晓蒙.欧洲高等教育质量保障25年(1990-2015):政策、研究与实践[J].教育研究,2016年438(7):135。 |
[2] | ASIIN.Standards for the Accreditation of (Further) Education and Training. 8-10. |
[3] | 夏天阳.各国高等教育评估[M].上海科学技术文献大学出版社,1997年12月版:117-118。 |
[4] | Andrea Bernhard. Quality Assurance in an International Higher Education Area: A Case Study Approach and Comparative Analysis. Das land Steirmark, 2011: 66. |
[5] | 毕家驹.英国ECUK的工程专业鉴定[J].高教发展与评估,2006(1):54。 |
[6] | M. Benito. R. Rome. The evaluation index of university grading improves quality evaluation: a perfect case study of French and German universities. Scientometrics (2011) 89: 153-176. |
[7] | 郑娟,王孙禺.英国工程教育专业认证与工程师职业资格衔接机制研究[J].中国大学教学,2017年第2期:88-96。 |
[8] | 李茂国,张彦通,张志英.工程教育认证:注册工程师:注册工程师认证制度的基础[J].高等工程教育研究,200(4):17-18。 |
[9] | ENGC.ECUK. Accreditation of Higher Education Programmes (AHEP) fourth edition: summary of key changes [EB/OL].https://www.engc.org.uk/standards-guidance/standards/accreditation-of-higher-education-programmes-ahep/fourth-edition-to-be-implemented-by-31-december-2021/ |
[10] | 唐霞.英国高等教育质量保证体系[M].北京师范大学出版社,2012年1月版:7。 |
[11] | 陈玉琨等著:高等教育质量保障体系概论[M].北京师范大学出版社:2004年版:46-47。 |
[12] | 郑文.本科应用型教育还是本科职业教育:历史演进与现实选择[J].高教探索2020年第1期:5-11。 |
[13] | 宋倩.高等学校应用型本科专业教育评估体系的研究[D].合肥工业大学2009年硕士论文:40-53。 |
[14] | 孙晓娟.专业认证视角下工程教育质量保障研究[D]:华东理工大学2016年硕士论文:27。 |
[15] | 陆国栋,赵燕,赵春鱼.基于扎根理论的工科人才培养路径研究-40所高校的卓越工程师培养报告文本分析[J]:高等工程教育研究,2018(5):56-64。 |
APA Style
Wang Fenping. (2021). Research on the Development Trends of European National Engineering Education Accreditation. Science Innovation, 9(6), 216-221. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20210906.11
ACS Style
Wang Fenping. Research on the Development Trends of European National Engineering Education Accreditation. Sci. Innov. 2021, 9(6), 216-221. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20210906.11
AMA Style
Wang Fenping. Research on the Development Trends of European National Engineering Education Accreditation. Sci Innov. 2021;9(6):216-221. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20210906.11
@article{10.11648/j.si.20210906.11, author = {Wang Fenping}, title = {Research on the Development Trends of European National Engineering Education Accreditation}, journal = {Science Innovation}, volume = {9}, number = {6}, pages = {216-221}, doi = {10.11648/j.si.20210906.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20210906.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20210906.11}, abstract = {European engineering colleges and universities account for a large proportion. The characteristics of engineering education Accreditation are reflected in the combination of professional Accreditation and curriculum design. The unification of Accreditation standards and the two-wheel drive of classification evaluation, the effective connection of professional Accreditation and engineer qualifications, and the importance of practicality in curriculum design And applicability, pay attention to the important role of employers in the process of student academic Accreditation and evaluation. China’s engineering education and other applied professional Accreditation and evaluations should learn from the above-mentioned characteristics of European engineering Accreditation. In the past ten years, China’s applied professional evaluation reforms in science and engineering, have gradually been in line with developed countries. Practice base construction, Embedded joint training and other methods in cooperation with employers have made great progress in universities across the country, but in terms of professional Accreditation and engineer qualifications, engineering and technical personnel serving as frontline teachers, and emphasis on the role of employers in the process of student academic Accreditation and evaluation More needs to be done.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Research on the Development Trends of European National Engineering Education Accreditation AU - Wang Fenping Y1 - 2021/11/05 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20210906.11 DO - 10.11648/j.si.20210906.11 T2 - Science Innovation JF - Science Innovation JO - Science Innovation SP - 216 EP - 221 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-787X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20210906.11 AB - European engineering colleges and universities account for a large proportion. The characteristics of engineering education Accreditation are reflected in the combination of professional Accreditation and curriculum design. The unification of Accreditation standards and the two-wheel drive of classification evaluation, the effective connection of professional Accreditation and engineer qualifications, and the importance of practicality in curriculum design And applicability, pay attention to the important role of employers in the process of student academic Accreditation and evaluation. China’s engineering education and other applied professional Accreditation and evaluations should learn from the above-mentioned characteristics of European engineering Accreditation. In the past ten years, China’s applied professional evaluation reforms in science and engineering, have gradually been in line with developed countries. Practice base construction, Embedded joint training and other methods in cooperation with employers have made great progress in universities across the country, but in terms of professional Accreditation and engineer qualifications, engineering and technical personnel serving as frontline teachers, and emphasis on the role of employers in the process of student academic Accreditation and evaluation More needs to be done. VL - 9 IS - 6 ER -