In China’s ancient history, 14 dynasties set their capitals in Shaanxi. The most glorious periods included the Zhou, the Qin, the Han and the Tang Dynasties. Owing to Shaanxi’s particular historical position, a large quantity of cultural heritage had been left underground and overground. Protecting well these cultural heritage is of great significance. By literature review, it is indicated that different types of research have been conducted from the perspectives of protection work (investigation report, annual report, material assembly), academic exploration (Shaanxi cultural heritage protection in earlier period, macro-research), monographic study (great site protection, revolutionary cultural heritage protection, field cultural heritage protection, cultural heritage protection and social economy, archaeological site and cultural heritage protection, legal system, cultural heritage crime, fight against cultural heritage crime, cultural heritage digitization) and case studies. However, these studies are inadequate in quantity, quality, depth, analysis and creativity. In particular, besides the natural deterioration, the cultural heritage is suffering from human damages during the economic activities, such as urbanization, commercialism, consumerism, tourism and cultural heritage crime. The existing protection management and utilization approach are no longer effective and influential enough, deserving improvements. This paper aims to investigate the problems in cultural heritage protection in Shaanxi, and then analyze their causes and finally put forward targeted strategies and suggestions. Field investigation, literature review and comparative data analysis methods have been adopted. It is found that the cultural protection problems in Shaanxi lie in natural damage, human destruction, constructive damage, protective damage and commercial damage, which are caused by incomplete and inadequate execution of protective policies and conservative measures, incompetence to carry out an overall and sustainable protection thoroughly, insufficient investment in cultural heritage protection, insufficient professional protection staff, underdeveloped infrastructural facilities, inadequate public supports, severe challenges in capacity building, imperfect legal system and conservative concepts. Correspondingly, the multi-approaches strategies concerning improvements in investment, archaeological excavation, security supervision, fight against tomb robbing and smuggling and public interest litigation system are put forward. And suggestions on enhancing value recognition, digitization, big data platform, talents and team building, revolutionary cultural heritage protection and collaboration are also discussed. It concludes that the new protective conception of “both object and humanity spirit take equal priority” should be implemented.
Published in | International Journal of Literature and Arts (Volume 9, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijla.20210903.12 |
Page(s) | 114-123 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cultural Heritage, Protection, Shaanxi
[1] | Marilyn Truscott. Indigenous Cultural Heritage Protection Program. Australian Archaeology, Dec. 1994, No. 39 (Dec. 1994), pp. 127-129. |
[2] | Ljubo LAH. From architectural conservation, renewal and rehabilitation to integral heritage protection (theoretical and conceptual starting points). Urbani Izziv, junij 2001, Vol. 12, No. 1, Prenova – grajeno okolje / Rehabilitation–The built environment (junij 2001), pp. 129-137. |
[3] | P.-J. Ezeh. Cultural Heritage Protection. Anthropology Today, Apr. 2008, Vol. 24, No. 2 (Apr. 2008), p. 26. |
[4] | Rui, LI. 2020 “Jianshou Chuxin Shiming Shaanxi Wenboren de Wenwu Baohu Liyong Zhilu”, Zhongguo Wenwubao 5-1: 002. |
[5] | Hong-cai, LUO. 2004. “Xijing Chouweihui yu Minguo Shiqi Shaanxi de Wenwu Baohu”, edited by Xi’an Cultural Relics Protection and Restoration Center. |
[6] | Qi-peng, WEI. 2016. “Biyuan dui Shaanxi de Wenwu Baohu Gongxian”, Renlei Wenhua Yichan Baohu, 00: 78-80. |
[7] | Qian-xue, TAN. 2014. “Minguo Shiqi de Shaanxi Wenwu Baohu yu Guanli”, Wenbo, 06: 80-85. |
[8] | Dong-qin, LUO. 2016. “Jianlun Shanganning Bianqu de Wenwu Baohu Shiye”, Zhongguo Minzu Bolan, 10: 238-239. |
[9] | Ting-hao, ZH. 1998. “Wenwu Baohu yu Shanxi Lvyouye Kechixu Fazhan.”Wenbo, 06: 37-39. |
[10] | Rong, Z. 2017. “Quanmian Tisheng Shaanxi Wenhua Yichan Baohu Shuiping.”Zhongguo Wenwubao, 11-07. |
[11] | Wei-hong, LIU. 2020. “Fuhe Guoqing de Wenwu Baohu Liyong Zhilu Shixian Lilun Tanxi”, Jianzhu yu Wenhua, 02: 22-27. |
[12] | Jing-wei, ZHANG. 2020. “Shaanxi Wenwu Baohu de Xianzhuang Wenti ji Duice”, Wenwu Jianding yu Jianshang, 09: 112-119. |
[13] | Zi-tao, PANG. 2015. “Shaanxisheng Wenwu Baohu Guanlisuo Xianzhuang ji Duice Tanxi”, Graduation Dissertation of Northwest University. |
[14] | Ke-you, FANG. 2015. “Shaanxi Wenwu Baohu Xianzhuang Wenti ji Duice Yanjiu”, Qingnian Shidai, 03: 14. |
[15] | Zhang-an, QI. 2002. “Jianli yu Shehui Zhuyi Shichang Jingji Xiangshiying de Wenwu Baohu Tizhi”, Shaanxi Shehui Zhuyi Xueyuan Xuebao, 04: 38-40. |
[16] | Wu, LU. 2012. “Shaanxi Dayizhi Baohu yu Liyong de Jidian Sikao”, Xibei Gongye Daxue Xuebao, 03: 72-76. |
[17] | Qian, TANG. 2018. “Geming Wenwu de Baohu yu Liyong Yanjiu”, Jianzhu yu Wenhua, 09: 195-196. |
[18] | Qian-tao, WEI. 2013. “Tianye Wenwu Baohu de Jidian Sikao-Yi Shaanxi Xingping Maoling Baohuqu Tianye Wenwu Baohu Weili”, Zhongguo Wenwubao, 1-9: 005. |
[19] | Hong-yan, LI. 2007. “Shaanxi Dayizhi Baohu yu Guihua dui Quyu Jingji de Yingxiang”, Xi’an Wenli Xueyuan Xuebao, 03: 32-34. |
[20] | Jun-chang, YANG. 2008. “Shaanxi Wenwu Keji Baohu Yanjiu Zongshu”, Archaeology and Cultural Relics, 06: 222-232. |
[21] | Qin-yu, Cheng. 2017. “Wenwu Baohu de Xingfa Yanjiu-Yi Shaanxi Weili”, Huanqiu Shichang Xinxi Daobao, 21: 10. |
[22] | Ke Ma., 2019 “Ssheng Dajue Gu Wenhua Yizhi Gumuzang Fanzui Xianzhuang Yu Fangkong Duice.”Xibei Daxue, Shuoshi Lunwen.https://kns.cnki.net/kns8/defaultresult/index. |
[23] | Nan-hua, CAO., Yu-lin, ZHENG. 2009. “Xi'an Wenwu Fanzui ji Dafang Duice”, Zhongguo Xingshi Jingcha, 03: 35-36. |
[24] | Dong, ZHAO. 2014. “Shuzihua Shengcunxia de Lishi Wenhua Ziyuan Baohu yu Kaifa Yanjiu-Yi Shaanxi wei Zhongxin”, Dissertation of Doctor’s Degree in Shandong University. |
[25] | Wei-dong, HOU., Fang, FANG. 1991. “Shaanxi Lintong Huaqingogng Tangchi Jianzhu Jizhi Jiqi Fuyuan Baohu Shexiang”, Chang’an Daxue Xuebao, Z1: 126. |
[26] | Bing, LI. 2009. “Jianguohou Xi’an Mingchengqiang de Baohu Licheng Jiqi Qishi”, Sichuan Jianzhu, 01: 10-12. |
[27] | Qing-hua, GUO. 1986. “Zhugeliang Yanjiu de Kaizhan Cujin le Wenwu Baohu”, Wenbo, 1986 (6). |
[28] | Shaanxi Cultural Heritage Administration. The Cultural Heritage Data of Shaanxi Province. http://wwj.shaanxi.gov.cn/wbxx/kydww/kydwwpcdjdw/. |
[29] | Kun, ZHANG. 2020. “Shaanxi Guancang Wentu Yufangxing Baohu Gongzuo Qude Chengxiao.” Zhongguo Wenwubao, 7-28: 003. |
[30] | Ting-hao, ZHANG. 1998. “Wenwu Baohu yu Shanxi Lvyouye Kechixu Fazhan.” Wenbo, 06: 37-39. |
[31] | Rong, Z. 2014. “Qieshi Zohao Chengzhenhua Guochengzhong De Wenwu Baohu Gongzuo.”Zhongguo Wenwubao, 3-19. |
[32] | Hong-yan, LI. 2007. “Shaanxi Dayizhi Baohu Yu Guihua Dui Quyu Jingji De Yingxiang. Xi’an Wenli Xueyuan Xuebao (Shehui Kexueban) 10 (3): 32-34. |
[33] | Guofen CH., Qing’an Y. 2005. “Shaanxi Wenwu Fanzui Xianzhuang Yu Duice.”Zhongguo Xingshi Jingcha, 68 (2): 41-43. |
[34] | Wu, LU. 2012. “Shaanxi Dayizhi Baohu Yu Liyong De Jidian Sikao.” Xibei Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexueban) 32 (3): 72-76. |
[35] | Qian, TANG. 2018. “Geming Wenwu De Baohu Yu Liyong Yanjiu.”Jianzhu Yu Wenhua 174 (9): 195-196. |
[36] | Juan-li, LUO. 2020. “Shehui Anfang Kongzhi Tixixia Tianye Wenwu De Litihua Baohu.”Shanxi Jingcha Xueyuan Xuebao, 28 (2): 34-39. |
[37] | Xin, JIANG. 2020. “Cong Baohu Wuhua Benti Dao Chuancheng Wenhua Jingshen--Xinshiqi Woguo Wenwu Baohu De Linian Chuangxin Yu Zhuanxing Fazhan Chutan.” Qian Yan, 427 (5): 39-45. |
[38] | Guofen, CH. 2005.“Shaanxi Wenwu Fanzui Xianzhuang yu Duice.”Zhongguo Xingshi Jingcha, (2): 41-43. |
[39] | Man-li, SUN. 2013. “Shaanxi Tuyizhi Baohu Xianzhuang Ji Duice”. Xibu Kaogu, 381-388. |
[40] | Yu-zhu, LIU. 2021. “Jiaqiang Kaogu He Lishi Wenhua Yichan Baohu.”Renmin Zhoukan, 409 (1): 62-64. |
[41] | An-ding, SHAO. 2018. “2008-2017 Nian Shaanxi Wenwu Baohu Yanjiu Zongshu.”Kaogu Yu Wenwu 14 (5): 148-169. |
[42] | Qin-yu, CH. 2017. “Wenwu Baohu De Xingfa Yanjiu--Yi Shaanxi Weili.”Huanqiu Shichang Xinxi Daobao, 696 (21): 10. |
[43] | Bo, PANG. 2020. “Shaanxi Wenwu Lingyu Naru Gongyi Susong Yiyi Zhongda.”Zhongguo Wenwubao 6-23. |
[44] | Pei-yi, LIANG, Jie YU. 2019. “Sichou Zhilu Yichan Lvyou: Chengzhenhua Ouhe Xietiao Shizheng Yanjiu--Yi Shanxisheng Weili.”Xibei Shifan Daxeu Xuebao (Shehui Kexueban) 55 (3): 118-124. |
[45] | Fang, LU. 2020. “Hulianwang+ Shiyuxia De Wenhua Shiji Huotaohua Baohu--Yi Shaanxi Sichou Zhilu Meishu Yichan Baohu Moshi Weili.” Yishu Yanjiu 136 (4): 90-91. |
[46] | Lu-ying, ZHANG. 2016. “Hulianwang jia Wenwu Baohu De Shijian Yu Tansuo--Jiyu Shaanxi Lishi Bowuguan Diaoyan Baogao Fenxi.”Xiandai Jiaoyuhua 35: 341-342. |
[47] | Rong, Z. 2009. “Shaanxisheng Dayizhi Baohu Xinlinian De Tansuo Yu Shijian.”Kaogu Yu Wenwu 92 (2): 7. |
[48] | Xian-zeng, GUO. 2006.“Shaanxisheng Diling Baohu Lifa Diaoyan Chutan.”Zhongguo Wenwu Bao, 11, 22. |
APA Style
Yang Jin, Liang Min, Zhang Pan. (2021). Problems and Strategies: Building a Future for Cultural Heritage Protection in Shaanxi, China. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 9(3), 114-123. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210903.12
ACS Style
Yang Jin; Liang Min; Zhang Pan. Problems and Strategies: Building a Future for Cultural Heritage Protection in Shaanxi, China. Int. J. Lit. Arts 2021, 9(3), 114-123. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20210903.12
AMA Style
Yang Jin, Liang Min, Zhang Pan. Problems and Strategies: Building a Future for Cultural Heritage Protection in Shaanxi, China. Int J Lit Arts. 2021;9(3):114-123. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20210903.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijla.20210903.12, author = {Yang Jin and Liang Min and Zhang Pan}, title = {Problems and Strategies: Building a Future for Cultural Heritage Protection in Shaanxi, China}, journal = {International Journal of Literature and Arts}, volume = {9}, number = {3}, pages = {114-123}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijla.20210903.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210903.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijla.20210903.12}, abstract = {In China’s ancient history, 14 dynasties set their capitals in Shaanxi. The most glorious periods included the Zhou, the Qin, the Han and the Tang Dynasties. Owing to Shaanxi’s particular historical position, a large quantity of cultural heritage had been left underground and overground. Protecting well these cultural heritage is of great significance. By literature review, it is indicated that different types of research have been conducted from the perspectives of protection work (investigation report, annual report, material assembly), academic exploration (Shaanxi cultural heritage protection in earlier period, macro-research), monographic study (great site protection, revolutionary cultural heritage protection, field cultural heritage protection, cultural heritage protection and social economy, archaeological site and cultural heritage protection, legal system, cultural heritage crime, fight against cultural heritage crime, cultural heritage digitization) and case studies. However, these studies are inadequate in quantity, quality, depth, analysis and creativity. In particular, besides the natural deterioration, the cultural heritage is suffering from human damages during the economic activities, such as urbanization, commercialism, consumerism, tourism and cultural heritage crime. The existing protection management and utilization approach are no longer effective and influential enough, deserving improvements. This paper aims to investigate the problems in cultural heritage protection in Shaanxi, and then analyze their causes and finally put forward targeted strategies and suggestions. Field investigation, literature review and comparative data analysis methods have been adopted. It is found that the cultural protection problems in Shaanxi lie in natural damage, human destruction, constructive damage, protective damage and commercial damage, which are caused by incomplete and inadequate execution of protective policies and conservative measures, incompetence to carry out an overall and sustainable protection thoroughly, insufficient investment in cultural heritage protection, insufficient professional protection staff, underdeveloped infrastructural facilities, inadequate public supports, severe challenges in capacity building, imperfect legal system and conservative concepts. Correspondingly, the multi-approaches strategies concerning improvements in investment, archaeological excavation, security supervision, fight against tomb robbing and smuggling and public interest litigation system are put forward. And suggestions on enhancing value recognition, digitization, big data platform, talents and team building, revolutionary cultural heritage protection and collaboration are also discussed. It concludes that the new protective conception of “both object and humanity spirit take equal priority” should be implemented.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Problems and Strategies: Building a Future for Cultural Heritage Protection in Shaanxi, China AU - Yang Jin AU - Liang Min AU - Zhang Pan Y1 - 2021/05/24 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210903.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijla.20210903.12 T2 - International Journal of Literature and Arts JF - International Journal of Literature and Arts JO - International Journal of Literature and Arts SP - 114 EP - 123 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-057X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210903.12 AB - In China’s ancient history, 14 dynasties set their capitals in Shaanxi. The most glorious periods included the Zhou, the Qin, the Han and the Tang Dynasties. Owing to Shaanxi’s particular historical position, a large quantity of cultural heritage had been left underground and overground. Protecting well these cultural heritage is of great significance. By literature review, it is indicated that different types of research have been conducted from the perspectives of protection work (investigation report, annual report, material assembly), academic exploration (Shaanxi cultural heritage protection in earlier period, macro-research), monographic study (great site protection, revolutionary cultural heritage protection, field cultural heritage protection, cultural heritage protection and social economy, archaeological site and cultural heritage protection, legal system, cultural heritage crime, fight against cultural heritage crime, cultural heritage digitization) and case studies. However, these studies are inadequate in quantity, quality, depth, analysis and creativity. In particular, besides the natural deterioration, the cultural heritage is suffering from human damages during the economic activities, such as urbanization, commercialism, consumerism, tourism and cultural heritage crime. The existing protection management and utilization approach are no longer effective and influential enough, deserving improvements. This paper aims to investigate the problems in cultural heritage protection in Shaanxi, and then analyze their causes and finally put forward targeted strategies and suggestions. Field investigation, literature review and comparative data analysis methods have been adopted. It is found that the cultural protection problems in Shaanxi lie in natural damage, human destruction, constructive damage, protective damage and commercial damage, which are caused by incomplete and inadequate execution of protective policies and conservative measures, incompetence to carry out an overall and sustainable protection thoroughly, insufficient investment in cultural heritage protection, insufficient professional protection staff, underdeveloped infrastructural facilities, inadequate public supports, severe challenges in capacity building, imperfect legal system and conservative concepts. Correspondingly, the multi-approaches strategies concerning improvements in investment, archaeological excavation, security supervision, fight against tomb robbing and smuggling and public interest litigation system are put forward. And suggestions on enhancing value recognition, digitization, big data platform, talents and team building, revolutionary cultural heritage protection and collaboration are also discussed. It concludes that the new protective conception of “both object and humanity spirit take equal priority” should be implemented. VL - 9 IS - 3 ER -